首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of swab and maceration methods for bacterial sampling of pig carcasses.
【2h】

A comparison of swab and maceration methods for bacterial sampling of pig carcasses.

机译:猪car体细菌取样的拭子法和浸渍法的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A swabbing technique was compared with an excision and maceration technique for bacteriological sampling of pig carcass skin surfaces. Total viable counts at 37 degrees C obtained by swabbing were 46% of those obtained by maceration. At 21 degrees C, swabbing gave total viable counts which were 54% of the counts obtained from excision samples. Escherichia coli counts showed wide variation with both sampling methods. Neither method was more efficient than the other in recovering E. coli, although excision sampling gave generally higher counts. Both methods were equally effective at recovering salmonellae from carcass surfaces. There was no significant difference between the methods in recovering particular Salmonella serotypes.
机译:将拭子技术与切除和浸渍技术进行了猪pig体皮肤表面细菌取样的比较。通过擦拭在37摄氏度下获得的总生存计数为浸渍法获得的总生存数量的46%。在21℃下,擦拭得到的总存活计数为从切除样品获得的计数的54%。两种采样方法的大肠杆菌计数均存在很大差异。尽管切除采样通常能提供更高的计数,但两种方法在回收大肠杆菌方面均没有效率更高。两种方法均能有效地从salmon体表面回收沙门氏菌。回收特定沙门氏菌血清型的方法之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号